Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | AS.080.355

Computational Principles of Biological Vision

3.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.67)

Even though we take it for granted, vision is a superpower. It is so central to how most of us interact with the world, and so effortless, that we are unaware of the astronomically complex computations that underlie it. There are no computer vision programs that can match the performance of the human visual system in understanding the real, physical, 3D world. On the biological side, vision is the most thoroughly studied sensory system. As such, vision is a rich target for computational understanding of the brain. Vision is the topic that both of us actively study, and remain passionately excited about. In this course, we present our up-to-the-minute synthesis of what we consider to be the most important insights into how vision, especially object vision, works, at the level of biological information processing. We believe the result is a coherent, mechanistic account of how the brain transforms images into visual understanding. We know of no textbook that provides a comparable viewpoint. In addition to presenting this visual information processing framework, we hope to teach you how to critically evaluate current research papers within that framework. To this end, we will be incorporating discussions of current research papers into our lectures.

Fall 2012

(4.85)

Fall 2013

(4.81)

Fall 2014

(4.35)

Fall 2012

Professor: Stewart Hendry

(4.85)

The best aspects of this course included the engaging and enjoyable class lectures which covered a wide range of topics. The professor was extremely passionate and presented the course material in an easy straightforward way. Students found some lectures difficult to understand, especially on topics like historical debates. The course would improve if students received more assistive resources like video podcasts and exam reviews in order to help them with the content. Prospective students should know that this course involves a substantial amount of reading each week and is very fast paced. Students should have some neuroscience background and should attend class regularly in order to perform well on the relatively fair exams.

Fall 2013

Professor: Stewart Hendry

(4.81)

Students found the best aspect of this course to be the chal enging but intriguing materials covered in class. The professor’s passion and knowledge of the subject made the lectures highly engaging, and the depth into each topic ensured that students understood the intricacies and nuances of the subject. Students found that this knowledge was tested in an unbalanced manner and that exams did not cover equal amounts of the information. Suggestions for improvement included shifting some of the exams in the schedule to lighten the material covered in the last exam. Any prospective students are advised that this is a reading-intensive course and that it is important to review all of the materials online in addition to the homework assignments. The class is stimulating and rewarding for any with an interest in neuroscience.

Fall 2014

Professor: Stewart Hendry

(4.35)

Students enjoyed the engaging lectures of this course and how they delved into current issues in the field. However, students felt that the course could have been better organized at times. Some students also felt that the course could be improved with less reading material to digest. Students recommended that people considering this course should be prepared for the large amount of reading, but they would benefit from the opportunity to analyze and understand scientific reviews and articles.

Lecture Sections

(01)

No location info
E. ConnorK. Nielsen
10:30 - 11:45