Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | AS.100.194

Undergraduate Seminar in History

3.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.11)

The second semester of the two-semester sequence required for majors, this course further introduces students to the theory and practice of history. Students write an essay based on original research.

Spring 2013

(3.44)

Spring 2013

(3.0)

Spring 2014

(4.8)

Spring 2014

(4.22)

Spring 2015

(5.0)

Spring 2015

(4.21)

Spring 2013

Professor: Todd Shepard

(3.44)

164 The best aspects of this course included the opportunity to conduct independent research and the conduciveness of the course to the development of thesis-writing skills. Some students felt the feedback from the instructor was at times, discouraging, and that the instructor was also pedantic in his lectures/explanations. One suggestion was to provide students with more time between the draft and the final paper. Another suggestion was to provide structured meeting periods to avoid redundancy in class discussions/lectures. Prospective students should know that starting their research as early as possible is highly recommended, as is scheduling regular meetings with the instructor.

Spring 2013

Professor: Mary Ryan

(3.0)

The best aspects of this course included gaining knowledge on effective thesis writing, performing data analysis, and producing a well-rounded research-based paper. Also, the students appreciated the instructor’s enthusiasm for the subject. Some students felt that the instructor’s expectations were unclear regarding the thesis papers and deadlines were, at times, posted unpredictably. Suggestions included devoting the entire year to the various stages of thesis writing and requiring more one-on-one conferences with the instructor/TA. Prospective students should know that this course is research-focused and writing-intensive.

Spring 2014

Professor: Marina Rustow

(4.8)

The independent research and consistent guidance from the instructor were the best aspects of this course. Many students ranked the workload and stress as the worst aspects of the course. More time between deadlines and more relevant readings were suggested improvements to the course. Prospective students should know that the class is rigorous, requires dedication, and is very rewarding.

Spring 2014

Professor: Gabriel Paquette

(4.22)

The focus on independent research and the support and guidance from the instructor and TA were the highest rated aspects of this course. Students felt a great sense of accomplishment and satisfaction at the end of the semester. The short time between some deadlines was the most negative aspect of the course. Some suggested improvements include an earlier start to the writing and researching sections of the course. Prospective students should know that this course requires self-direction and dedication.

Spring 2015

Professor: Erin Rowe

(5.0)

The best aspects of the class included the freedom and independence to research and write a paper on a subject of interest. Students found that the professor was helpful and encouraging, and provided frequent, detailed, and thoughtful feedback throughout the writing and research process. The worst part was the 40 page paper of original research, which many students found to be challenging and difficult to manage time-wise. Suggestions for improvement included beginning the writing process earlier (in the first semester), having more opportunities for peer-editing, and having more frequent, periodic deadlines. Prospective students should know that this seemingly daunting class is extremely rewarding.

Spring 2015

Professor: Ronald Walters

(4.21)

The best part of this class was that the professor was extremely helpful with setting students up for success on their senior thesis. Some students had difficulty dealing with the unorganized class structure. This class could be improved by starting writing during the first semester of seminar and having better organization of the overall course. Prospective students should only take this class if they are history majors.