Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | AS.110.304

Elementary Number Theory

4.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.06)

The student is provided with many historical examples of topics, each of which serves as an illustration of and provides a background for many years of current research in number theory. Primes and prime factorization, congruences, Euler's function, quadratic reciprocity, primitive roots, solutions to polynomial congruences (Chevalley's theorem), Diophantine equations including the Pythagorean and Pell equations, Gaussian integers, Dirichlet's theorem on primes.

Fall 2012

(4.29)

Fall 2013

(3.89)

Fall 2014

(4.43)

Spring 2013

(3.9)

Spring 2014

(3.5)

Spring 2015

(4.33)

Spring 2023

(3.77)

Summer 2023

(4.4)

Fall 2012

Professor: W Stephen Wilson

(4.29)

The best aspect of this course was the class structure, which al owed students to think logical y and understand the content without having to be so worried about grades. There was emphasis on the homework assignments and proofs in an independent format that encouraged independent learning. The worst aspects of the course included the lack of class lectures and the incessant reviews of the homework assignments. The course could improve if the professor gave detailed lectures from time to time and perhaps provided homework examples to students. Prospective students should be aware that this course includes weekly quizzes and homework, but involves no exams. Students interested in this course should be familiar with proofs and be prepared to spend a good amount of time on homework.

Fall 2013

Professor: Jian Kong

(3.89)

Multiple students praised this course for teaching students how to do mathematical proofs as well as having fair tests. Many students found the instructor lackluster, as some said he spoke too quickly while others said he seemed to merely copy material from the textbook onto the board during lectures. Suggestions for improvement included a desire from multiple students for greater support while learning and wishing the instructor deviated from the textbook during instruction. Prospective students should know that a math background was beneficial to success in the course.

Fall 2014

Professor: Giovanni Di Matteo

(4.43)

Students felt that this course benefited from the clear delivery and helpfulness of the professor. Students found that the mid-term was especial y chal enging. Some students thought the class could be improved with better review or the availability of notes in preparation for the mid-term. Students wanted prospective participants for this class to know that this class requires substantial work, but that they found the course rewarding. 218

Spring 2013

Professor: Jian Kong

(3.9)

The best aspect of the course was the interesting and fairly challenging material. The worst aspects of the course were the dul lectures and the hard to fol ow professor. The lectures dwelt on lots of proofs and the professor was often difficult to understand while he was teaching. The course would improve if the professor would take his time to explain different types of problems and if there was a better supporting textbook for the class. Prospective students should ensure they attend al lectures and keep up with the homework assignments in this fairly challenging course. 190

Spring 2014

Professor: Nitya Kitchloo

(3.5)

Overall, students gave the material and the lectures of this course high marks. Some students thought the instructor was approachable and passionate. The subject is chal enging, and students ranked the homework and exams as the worst aspect in the course. Additional practice problems and a different textbook were suggested improvements in the course. Prospective students who enjoy math already will find this course challenging and rewarding.

Spring 2015

Professor: Jian Kong

(4.33)

The best aspects of the class included the chal enging but interesting material and the practice with proofs that the course afforded. Students praised the professor’s eagerness to help students learn, his ability to make difficult material easily intelligible, and his helpful feedback. Some students had problems getting to the once-per-week office hours, and others claimed that the exams were much more difficult than the homework. This class could be improved by returning homework with graded explanations in addition to offering students more practice exams. Prospective students should have taken Calculus II and should be familiar with proofs.

Spring 2023

Professor: Huajie Li

(3.77)

Summer 2023

Professor: Nicholas Marshburn

(4.4)

Lecture Sections

(01)

No location info
E. Rijke
09:00 - 09:50

(88)

No location info
N. Marshburn
No class times info