Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | AS.110.405

Real Analysis I

4.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.29)

This course is designed to give a firm grounding in the basic tools of analysis. It is recommended as preparation (but may not be a prerequisite) for other advanced analysis courses and may be taken as an Introduction to Proofs (IP) course. Topics include the formal properties of real and complex number systems, topology of metric spaces, limits, continuity, infinite sequences and series, differentiation, Riemann-Stieltjes integration. Prerequisites: Grade of C- or better in 110.201 or 110.212 and 110.202 or 110.211

Fall 2012

(4.79)

Fall 2013

(4.17)

Fall 2014

(4.44)

Fall 2022

(4.51)

Spring 2013

(4.18)

Spring 2014

(3.95)

Spring 2023

(4.39)

Spring 2023

(4.2)

Summer 2023

(3.98)

Fall 2012

Professor: Jose Gomez

(4.79)

The best aspect of this course was the professor, who taught the course content in a clear and enthusiastic way. The professor showed a genuine interest in making sure the students understood al of the subject material and was always available to assist them during office hours. The worst aspect of this course was the teaching assistant sessions, as the teaching assistant was often unable to communicate the information clearly. The course could improve if the teaching assistant sessions were restructured and if some of the workload was slightly reduced. Prospective students should know that this is a chal enging course which requires constant practice and review. Students who want to be successful in this course should spend a lot of time with the material, read, and do the homework assignments carefully.

Fall 2013

Professor: Joel Spruck

(4.17)

Students praised this course, which covered chal enging material, and the instructor, who presented the information in a logical and understandable way. Some students disliked that they received little to no feedback on their homework. Suggestions for improvement included a broad desire among students for more feedback on assignments. Prospective students should know that students found the course to be a very challenging analysis course, and a familiarity with math proofs was helpful.

Fall 2014

Professor: Christopher Sogge

(4.44)

Students praised this course for having an instructor who led a clear and well-organized course that went over interesting material. Perceived issues with this course largely focused on exams; the bulk of students’ grades were determined by how wel they did on two exams each of which had only a handful of questions. Student felt those exams were unnecessarily hard and disliked that doing poorly on either 219exam could dramatically impact their grade in the course. Suggestions for improvement included a desire by multiple students that there be more questions on exams or additional opportunities for people to demonstrate their mastery of the subject matter. Prospective students should know that students found it useful to have some experience completing formal proofs and students found that their grade was largely determined by how they did on two exams.

Fall 2022

Professor: Jeffrey Marino

(4.51)

Spring 2013

Professor: MATHEMATICS

(4.18)

The best aspect of the course was the well organized and presented lectures. The worst aspects of the course were the difficult concepts and homework assignments. Students felt the professor’s lectures were an extension of the book and therefore didn’t offer much more to the class. The course would improve if the lectures were more engaging and if there were more practice problems or supportive materials to help students understand the math better. Prospective students should have a strong background in Calculus and Algebra, and should stay on top of the homework assignments to help them understand the problems better.

Spring 2014

Professor: Jacob Bernstein

(3.95)

In this course, the instructor’s willingness to help, the content, and the intellectual challenge were all rated as the best aspects of the course. The worst aspects of the course were the difficulty of the exams and homework. Some suggestions for improvement included giving more opportunity for student participation in-class along with more examples of practical applications. Prospective students should know that the work is mainly proof based, and can be a struggle at times.

Spring 2023

Professor: Jeffrey Marino

(4.39)

Spring 2023

Professor: Chamsol Park

(4.2)

Summer 2023

Professor: Jeffrey Marino

(3.98)

Lecture Sections

(01)

No location info
F. Lu
13:30 - 14:20

(88)

No location info
J. Marino
No class times info