Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | AS.150.205

Introduction to the History of Modern Philosophy

3.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(3.87)

An overview of philosophical thought in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. We shall focus on fundamental questions in epistemology (knowledge, how we acquire it, its scope and limits), metaphysics (the ultimate nature of reality, the relation of mind and body, free will), and theology (the existence and nature of God, God’s relation to the world, whether knowledge of such things is possible): all questions that arose in dramatic ways as a result of the rise of modern science. The principal philosophers to be discussed are Descartes, Locke, Hume and Kant, though we shall also make the acquaintance of Spinoza, Leibniz and Berkeley.

Spring 2013

(3.9)

Spring 2014

(3.63)

Spring 2015

(3.57)

Spring 2023

(4.38)

Spring 2013

Professor: Michael Williams

(3.9)

The best aspects of this course included the opportunity to learn about metaphysics and epistemology, the sections that aided students in understanding the material, and the course content that was delivered both coherently and chronologically. Students also appreciated the instructor’s engaging and often humorous demeanor. Some students felt that the required amount of reading was excessive for an introductory course. Suggestions included providing students with a brief but comprehensive overview of the material and making a set of specific questions available before section. Prospective students should know that the material in this class is intriguing and thought-provoking, but that the workload is time-consuming and dense.

Spring 2014

Professor: Yitzhak Melamed

(3.63)

This cool and laid back professor taught his students about many important philosophers and pushed the class to ask questions despite the large class size. Students enjoyed the luxury of only having to complete two papers and a take home final. However, there was an uneven distribution of focus on certain philosophers and students didn’t agree with this. It was also pointed out that the course was disorganized and didn’t fol ow the syl abus. Suggestions for improvement include: a more focused plan for class periods, an even amount of time spent on each subject, and a change in the way discussions are run. Prospective students should know that this course wil be boring if they are not interested in philosophy.

Spring 2015

Professor: Michael Williams

(3.57)

The best aspects of this course included the opportunity for students to learn about interesting, thought provoking concepts. Some students felt lectures moved too fast and the overall course was intellectually chal enging. This course could be improved by incorporating secondary sources on philosophy for students to better understand ideas, and spending more time on difficult theories and concepts in class. Prospective students should know this lecture based course requires a lot of reading. Students are encouraged to take thorough notes in class and work hard on papers wel before the due date.

Spring 2023

Professor: Patrick Connolly

(4.38)