Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | AS.190.344

Seminar in Anti-Semitism

3.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.19)

Jews exercise a good deal of power in contemporary America.. They are prominent in a number of key industries, play important roles in the political process, and hold many major national offices. For example, though Jews constitute barely two percent of America’s citizens, about one-third of the nation’s wealthiest 400 individuals are Jewish and more than ten percent of the seats in the U.S. Congress are held by Jews. One recent book declared that, “From the Vatican to the Kremlin, from the White House to Capitol Hill, the world’s movers and shakers view American Jewry as a force to be reckoned with.” Of course, Jews have risen to power in many times and places ranging from the medieval Muslim world and early modern Spain through Germany and the Soviet Union in the 20th century. In nearly every prior instance, though, Jewish power proved to be evanescent. No sooner had the Jews become “a force to be reckoned with” than they found themselves banished to the political ma rgins, forced into exile or worse. Though it may rise to a great height, the power of the Jews seems ultimately to rest on a rather insecure foundation. Cross-listed with Jewish Studies. Course is open to juniors and seniors.

Fall 2012

(4.0)

Fall 2013

(4.24)

Spring 2015

(4.33)

Fall 2012

Professor: Benjamin Ginsberg

(4.0)

The best aspect of this course was the professor whose enthusiasm translated into engaging lectures. The worst aspects of the course included the lengthy class periods and student presentations. The students also felt like the professor’s teaching only provided a one-sided look at anti-semitism. The course could improve if students received more feedback on their papers and presentations. Prospective students should know that this is a great course that deals with a real y interesting topic and is light on the workload.

Fall 2013

Professor: Benjamin Ginsberg

(4.24)

Students widely praised the course’s instructor as an “extraordinary lecturer” who brought different insight on an “interesting topic.” Some students found the in-class presentations took up too much of the class and could be a drag when presentations were poor. Suggestions for improvement included putting a time limit on student presentations and perhaps making attendance mandatory or part of students’ grades in order to aid group discussions. Prospective students should know that students found the workload was manageable and covered an interesting subject matter.

Spring 2015

Professor: Seminar In Anti-Semitism

(4.33)

The best parts of this course were the stimulating material and class discussion. The course load was manageable and the professor conveyed uncomfortable topics in an open, authentic way. Some students felt they did not have enough direction on assignments and there was not enough course discussion. This course could be improved by having less presentations and lectures, and more class discussion time. Students also suggested providing a rubric with clear expectations concerning assignments. Prospective students should know that 70% of the course grade was determined by the final paper.