Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | AS.200.204

Human Sexuality

3.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.59)

Course focuses on sexual development, sexuality across the lifespan, gender identity, sexual attraction and arousal, sexually transmitted disease, and the history of commercial sex workers and pornography. Please note that the use of electronic devices is not permitted during this class, in order to promote the full interactive potential of this engaging seminar-style offering. Open to Juniors & Seniors within the following majors/minors: Behavioral Biology; Biology; Cognitive Science; Medicine, Science & the Humanities; Molecular & Cellular Bio; Neuroscience; Psychological & Brain Sciences; Public Health; Sociology; Study of Women, Gender, & Sexuality. Students may receive credit for either AS.200.204 or AS.290.420, but not both.

Fall 2012

(4.87)

Fall 2013

(4.59)

Fall 2014

(4.57)

Spring 2013

(4.24)

Spring 2014

(4.56)

Spring 2015

(4.69)

Fall 2012

Professor: Chris Kraft

(4.87)

The best aspect of the course was the informative and interesting course content. The professor made the class enjoyable and easy to follow. The worst aspects of the course included the amount of writing that students had to do and the lack of feedback on their writing assignments. The course would improve if there were more class discussions and if the class could be split into two shorter class periods during the week. Prospective students should know that this is a fun course that will explore human sexuality, and they should be open minded in order to ful y enjoy it.

Fall 2013

Professor: Ann Jarema, Chris Kraft

(4.59)

The best aspects of this course included the interesting materials used in class, as well as the highly engaging professor. Students enjoyed the videos and felt that the relaxed atmosphere made it more comfortable for people to speak up in discussions. Many people thought that the lecture was a bit long, and that some of the topics were discussed without much depth. Suggestions for improvement included updating some of the materials to include new studies and articles. Students also wanted a brief break in the middle of class. Any prospective students should know that this is a basic introductory course, but that the work load is light and the testing is fairly lenient.

Fall 2014

Professor: Anna Jarema, Chris Kraft

(4.57)

Students appreciated the engaging lectures and relevant subject matter of this course. Some students thought that the course could have delved deeper into its subject and that they could have received greater feedback on assignments. Students thought the course could be improved by receiving more guidance on what exams would cover. Students also thought that it was important that people planning to take this course know that they should be prepared to discuss subject matter that some might find difficult to talk about.

Spring 2013

Professor: Chris Kraft

(4.24)

The best aspects of this course included the small class-size, the discussion-based format, the intriguing material, and the enthusiastic instructor. Some students felt that the instructor thematically covered material with too much generalization. Students also felt that the instructor could’ve provided more feedback. Suggestions included having the instructor monitor the TA’s grading practices more rigorously and bringing some of the subject material into more focus. Prospective students should know this is a very popular class, so early registration is key. Also, they need to be prepared to write a lengthy paper during the course of the semester.

Spring 2014

Professor: Chris Kraft

(4.56)

The instructor and the material covered were rated as the best aspects of this course. The instructor was engaging, informative, and not shy or embarrassed when discussing taboo subjects. The material presented was timely and the instructor included patient experiences to il ustrate the information. The worst aspects of this course were the essay assignments which many students found disconnected from the material, and some students thought the instructor was biased and insensitive. Some suggestions for improving the course included providing more specific feedback on written assignments, breaking up the class time to shorter, more frequent classes, and encouraging more student led discussion. Prospective students should know that the course has a low workload, but don’t neglect to study and read the materials. You should be open to discussing topics that might be taboo or embarrassing.

Spring 2015

Professor: Chris Kraft

(4.69)

The best part about this course was the charismatic and engaging professor. This course broadened students understanding of human sexuality. Students appreciated the open discussion that was fostered within a comfortable, sharing environment. Some students felt they did not get enough feedback on their work. Others felt that there was a disparity between the material covered in class and the information included in the textbook. This course could be improved by giving students a study guide for tests. Prospective students should come with an open mind for this interesting and relaxed class. This course is good for seniors.