Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | AS.210.252

Intermediate Italian II

3.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(3.96)

Taught in Italian. Course continues building on the four essential skills for communication presented in Intermediate Italian I (listening, speaking, reading, writing) on topics of increasing complexity. Course adopts a continuous assessment system.

Spring 2013

(3.5)

Spring 2013

(2.93)

Spring 2013

(4.22)

Spring 2014

(4.13)

Spring 2014

(3.9)

Spring 2015

(4.11)

Spring 2015

(4.33)

Spring 2023

(4.57)

Spring 2013

Professor: Janet Gomez

(3.5)

The best aspects of this course included the Italian grammatical structure, the incorporation of daily conversations, and the instructor’s availability to help. One student felt the selected course material was ambiguous and didn’t focus enough on concepts pertinent to Italian culture. Some students felt that the instructor’s preference for both Dropbox and email made it difficult to keep the assignments and other course material organized; that he should use Blackboard in the future. Suggestions included utilizing a more contemporary classroom and combining more grammar into the class routine. Prospective students should know that this class requires a lot of work outside of the classroom.

Spring 2013

Professor: Troy Tower

(2.93)

The best aspects of this course included the Italian grammatical structure, the incorporation of daily conversations, and the instructor’s availability to help. One student felt the selected course material was ambiguous and didn’t focus enough on concepts pertinent to Italian culture. Some students felt that the instructor’s preference for both Dropbox and email made it difficult to keep the assignments and other course material organized; that he should use Blackboard in the future. Suggestions included utilizing a more contemporary classroom and combining more grammar into the class routine. Prospective students should know that this class requires a lot of work outside of the classroom.

Spring 2013

Professor: Michele Zanobini

(4.22)

The best aspects of this course included the opportunities to learn about German culture, the relevant textbook and the in-class discussions. Some students felt that the instructor was unorganized and that some of the lessons repeated each other. One suggestion was to incorporate more time for oral practice. Another suggestion was to require that more German be spoken in class. Prospective students should know that this course contains creative projects and a large amount of grammar review.

Spring 2014

Professor: Teodoro Katinis

(4.13)

The high points of this course included the variety of content covered and the patient and enthusiastic instructor. Many students thought the instructor had their best interests in mind and wanted his students to succeed. The amount of daily homework was by far the most cited negative in this course. Reducing the homework assignments was the improvement suggested. Students interested in the course should try to take it with this instructor, and should be ready to speak Italian as often as possible.

Spring 2014

Professor: Alyssa Falcone

(3.9)

Students gave the instructor high marks for her patient attitude and the way she encouraged participation in class. The repetitive and frequent homework was the worst aspect of the course. Many students suggested more emphasis on reading and writing, along with fewer homework assignments, as improvements to the course. Prospective students should know that there is regular work that needs to be completed, but this course is a good class to prepare for Advanced.

Spring 2015

Professor: Lorenzo Bacchini

(4.11)

The best aspect of this class was the fun, effective instructor who covered a wide range of topics. Students appreciated the instructor’s wil ingness to engage students and help with any questions or concerns. The worst aspect of this course was the lack of organization and the large amount of assignments. Suggestions for improvement included spreading the homework more evenly throughout the semester and defining course objectives more clearly. Prospective students should be prepared to work as this class contains a large volume of information. Class attendance is necessary.

Spring 2015

Professor: Alessandro Zannirato

(4.33)

The best aspect of this course was the dialogue spoken in class by the students and the personable, engaging instructor. The instructor made it easy to absorb the material. The worst aspect of the course included the very heavy workload and the new, ineffective textbook. Suggestions for improvement included having a better organized course and increasing the opportunities for in class discussion. Prospective students should know that the class is a lot of fun, but also a lot of work. Students should attend class and complete the homework to do well in the class.

Spring 2023

Professor: Leonardo Proietti

(4.57)