Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | AS.210.317

Adv Spanish Composition

3.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(3.6)

This third-year course is a hands-on and process-oriented introduction to discussion and compositional analysis. On completion of this course, students will have improved their Spanish writing skills in various types of compositions they might be expected to write in academic settings and in real-life formats such as film reviews, letters to the editor, cover letters, etc. The course also focuses on refinement of grammar and vocabulary use. Not open to native speakers of Spanish. .

Spring 2013

(2.01)

Spring 2014

(4.29)

Spring 2015

(4.5)

Spring 2013

Professor: Sara Urruticoechea Romero

(2.01)

The best aspects of this course included the consistent speaking opportunities, the instructor’s enthusiasm for the course material, and the cumulative coverage of vocab, history, literature, culture, and grammar. One student felt that grammar was not taught enough. Another student felt the unit themes were strange and applied very little, if at all, to important facets of the Italian language. Suggestions included incorporating more of an emphasis on grammar and assigning less “busy work” as homework. Prospective students should know that participation is crucial in order to receive a passing grade in this course.

Spring 2014

Professor: Sara Urruticoechea Romero

(4.29)

Students thought the group writing assignments, effective instructor, and the level of writing were the highlights of this course. However, many students found the emphasis on grammar, as opposed to a mastery of composition, to be the worst aspect of the course. More complexity in the readings and writing assignments was suggested as an area for improvement. Prospective students should know that the challenge of this course varies a great deal based on your previous knowledge of Spanish. Some students thought the material was repetitive, while others did not. The emphasis is on writing, but at times the topics are bland.

Spring 2015

Professor: Sara Urruticoechea Romero

(4.5)

The best aspects of the course were the engaging instructor who gave helpful feedback to students and the strong conversational elements of the course. Students felt that there were not enough assignments to practice concepts and that there was a large learning curve from Intermediate to Advanced courses. Suggestions for improvement included creating opportunities for more informal discussions and increasing the amount of grammar exercises. Prospective students should be aware of the heavy workload and challenging course material.