Students loved the interdisciplinary aspect of this course as they found that each professor brought unique and interesting insight to the topics discussed. Students also liked the course materials, and thought that the entire course was well executed. Students often found the readings long, difficult, and sometimes overlapping as well as dated. Other students disliked the fact that each professor graded differently, and that grading was often harsh. Students suggested providing more concise specifications for their writing assignments, as well as a more cohesive outline for the course overal . Prospective students should know that the course load is moderate and the topic is interesting, especial y if students are interested in Baltimore. It is important to complete the readings and be prepared to write weekly memos.

206Students gave high marks to the insightful lectures, the engaging discussions, and the views from various disciplines on one topic. Many students commented they felt compelled to focus on a life of social justice after this class. The worst aspects of the class were the heavy workload, harsh grading, and what some students perceived to be biased instruction. Suggestions to improve the class included spending more time on Baltimore-specific issues, reducing the workload by a third, and clarifying grading methods. Students considering this course should know that the workload could be overwhelming, but for those with an interest in social policy the class is well worth it.