The best aspect of this course was the enjoyable, hands-on learning experience where students got exposure to different types of painting. Also, the professor was very helpful and students got the chance to discover skil s they didn’t know they had. The worst aspects of this course included the lengthy class sessions and the extra time outside of class that students had to allocate to their painting pieces. The course would improve if the class time could be extended and perhaps split into two shorter periods, as opposed to one lengthy class period per week. Prospective students should know that this is a very rewarding painting course, which requires a lot of personal commitment in order for them to be successful. 21

The best aspect of this class was the opportunity it al owed students to paint and grow as an artist. The course allowed students to perform a variety of painting exercises and receive feedback, which multiple students felt helped them grows as artists. Criticism for the class was few and far between, but some students said there wasn’t enough time during class to complete their works without them feeling rushed. Suggestions for improvement included expanded time for the class either by adding an additional class day each week or providing more guidance during existing class time for students. Prospective students should know that painting experience isn’t required but was helpful. The course was somewhat time intensive and required some investment of time outside of class to complete work.

Students greatly enjoyed the relaxing and supportive atmosphere created by this course that had a small class size. Students’ issues with the course centered on a feeling that there wasn’t enough time during class to complete projects and that completing work required a significant amount of time outside of class. Suggestions for improvement varied greatly among students, with some students suggesting the course should shift from one long class a week to multiple shorter courses per week. Prospective students should know that students are expected to work a significant amount of time outside of class in order to complete their work.

The best aspect of the course was the practical nature of the class where students got to do specific assignments that helped them grow in their skills. The professor also provided useful and positive feedback to all of the students. The worst aspect of the course was the workload in and out of class. Although students felt the class was great the way it was, the course could improve if it were counted towards an Art requirement. Prospective students should take this class as it is very enjoyable and not too difficult.

Many students agreed that the professor of this course was excellent and energetic. They also enjoyed improving their techniques as well as the close interaction with the professor. Another great aspect about the course was examining and critiquing other work because it chal enged students. The worst aspects of this course were the expensive supplies and lengthy class periods. Also some of the technical aspects of drawing were not expanded upon enough for many students. Suggestions for improvement include: more time to explore different mediums, and more focus on teaching and demonstrating techniques. Prospective students would find it helpful to have previous experience.

This course allowed students of different artistic calibers to achieve based on their skill set. The course also pushes students to do their best and is a wonderful option for winding down a hectic schedule. The professor is an excellent teacher who encourages his students and offers constructive feedback. Supplies required for this course tend to be expensive and if the student is a slow painter, they might have to put in more hours of work. Students suggested a larger workspace, increasing course to a 3 credits, and more col aboration between peers to improve this course. Prospective students should have ample amount of time on their hands because of the long hours of work, and be wil ing to get dirty.

Professor Hankin provided an enjoyable break from the regular STEM classes, allowing students to delve into Studio Drawing II in a relaxing and enjoyable manner. Professor Hankin offered students the ability to explore different materials, techniques and subjects during the semester, and provided both thoughtful explanations and much encouragement along the way. Some students believed that assignments were too time consuming given the two-credit designation. This class could be improved with a trip to an art museum. Students considering this class should know that the teacher was available to help anyone willing to learn about art, and that prior experience is not necessary.

The best part of this course was the fact that Professor Hankin broke painting down to the lowest level, and then built students up until they were able to create oil paintings. Students found that the professor’s lectures provided a solid background on the history of oil painting. Many students felt that materials were expensive and a lot of time was required outside of the classroom to finish projects on time. This course would have benefited by having more instruction from Professor Hankin during the creative process, not just after assignments were completed. Prospective students should know that they will need to allocate time to work on projects outside of class time.