Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | AS.371.165

Location Photography

3.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.35)

Working in the studio and in various locations, students will learn the fundamentals of lighting interiors and strategies for working in almost any environment. Field trips will include the National Aquarium, Evergreen Museum & Library, a Howard County horse farm, a Tiffany-designed church and a photo studio. Students will also concentrate on the fine art of printing in our digital lab. They will develop a final portfolio of 10 photographs which express a personal vision about a location of their choice. A basic knowledge of digital photography is helpful, but not required. Approval for this course will be considered after enrollment on SIS. First class is mandatory

Fall 2012

(3.8)

Fall 2013

(4.22)

Fall 2014

(4.89)

Spring 2013

(4.7)

Spring 2014

(3.8)

Spring 2015

(4.67)

Fall 2012

Professor: Howard Ehrenfeld

(3.8)

The best aspects of the course included the field trips to different locations for photo shoots and the opportunities that this class offered for students to be creative. The worst aspects of the course included the in-class photo editing and the lab activities. Students found a lot of technicalities with the photo-editing software, Lightroom and often had a difficult time keeping up. The course would improve if students had more individualized attention with the professor, so that they could improve and learn 23 the techniques more effectively. The professor should also endeavor to spend more time discussing the different photo editing programs. Prospective students should know that this fun course involves lots of in-class photo editing labs and field trips.

Fall 2013

Professor: Howard Ehrenfeld

(4.22)

The best aspects of this class were the field trips students took to varying locations as well as the artistic freedom the class offered. Some students felt that the class could have used clearer direction and instruction while others said they would have liked more feedback from the instructor. Suggestions for improvement included an increased emphasis on one-on-one feedback and instruction. Prospective students should know that the course was fun and was great for people who are into photography.

Fall 2014

Professor: Howard Ehrenfeld

(4.89)

Students broadly praised this course that allowed them not only a creative outlet but a break from normal university life as students frequently took field trips for photo shoots. Issues with the course included a feeling by some students that the course was a bit disorganized and lacked feedback. Recommendations for improvement largely centered on a desire for greater clarity in terms of guidelines and expectations for the course as well as a request for more feedback in class and on assignments. Prospective students should know that basic camera knowledge isn’t required in order to sign up for this course; however, students found that it was helpful.

Spring 2013

Professor: Howard Ehrenfeld

(4.7)

The best aspects of the course included the field trips to various locations and the very passionate professor who provided students with lots of helpful feedback. The worst aspects of the course included the untimely feedback the professor provided to students. Most students never knew how they were being graded in the class or if they were performing well. The course would improve if students were given clearer grading systems and outlines for the assignments and projects. Prospective students should know this is a fun course in which they wil take lots of photos in great locations all over Baltimore.

Spring 2014

Professor: Howard Ehrenfeld

(3.8)

The best aspect of this course was travelling to varying locations to take photos. Students were able to look at objects in a different way, as well as improve their photography skills. Many students felt like the professor was an expert and showed his students how to take photos and edit them like an expert. However, there was a lack of feedback offered to students and unclear instructions. Suggestions for improvement include: more organization, more assistance, more time spent on Photoshop. Prospective students should expect a fun class that requires a lot of work, and the field trips are not always

Spring 2015

Professor: Howard Ehrenfeld

(4.67)

Students enjoyed the many field trips during this class to locations around Baltimore from the National Aquarium to a Penthouse at the Inner Harbor. Students appreciated the independence that they had while working on independent projects, as well as the feedback received when developing photos. Some students, however, felt that the extra cost for printing software downloads were off-putting. Suggestions for improvement included making this class twice a week, and having more grades listed throughout the semester. Prospective students should know that it is important to have prior Photoshop experience.