The best aspects of the course included the outdoor, hands-on training, and real-life applications it provided, as well as the light workload. Some students felt the instructor would go on tangents too much. Some students also complained that the instructor often ran over on time. Suggestions included organizing communication, switching up the squads and platoons every once in a while, and making class time more structured. Prospective students should know that this course is heavily ROTC-based and they must be ready to apply lessons learned in labs.

Many students agreed that the hands-on field experience was beneficial and that they actually understood what was transpiring. However, sometimes this lab was physically grueling. In addition, many students felt that there was a lack of team leader practice. Suggestions for improvement include: a variation in lab activities such as radio etiquette and a lab devoted to weapons, and more chances to practice leadership. Prospective students should know that this lab is very physical and is a good introductory course to feel the Army “culture.”

The best part about this class was that it taught students how to learn and grow from mistakes through the mentorship the cadre provided. Students appreciated the hands-on approach to learning as well as the variety of skills presented. Students felt that this class could be improved by having more graded assignments and familiarization with Army protocol. Prospective students should have a base understanding of the Army and how it is run prior to taking this course. Basic Leadership Laboratory II is run by Army ROTC.