Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | AS.374.410

Advanced Planning & Decision Making I

1.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.68)

Students develop a semester-long progression of programmed training activates that support completion of the unit’s Mission Essential Task List. The laboratory builds from fall to spring semester as students master advanced problem solving, resource synchronization and executive decision making. Students evaluate, mentor and develop subordinate leaders as part of the Leadership Development Program and FM 6-22, Army Leadership. The course serves as the final evaluation and determination on a student’s ability to lead Soldier’s as a Second Lieutenant in the US Army. Co-requisite: AS.374.401-AS.374.402. Recommended Course Background: AS.374.301-AS.374.302, AS.374.310-AS.374.320 and Basic Course. Military Science courses require department permission and are restricted to active or inquiring ROTC members.

Fall 2012

(4.5)

Fall 2013

(4.83)

Fall 2014

(4.71)

Fall 2012

Professor: Paul Carrol

(4.5)

The best aspects of the course included the insightful readings, engaging class discussions, and the energetic professor. Students found the museum maps to be a very useful tool in helping them learn about different locations. The worst aspect of the course was the hefty amount of readings as there was lots of information that had to be covered from week to week. The course would improve if the readings were reduced and more tied into class discussions. Prospective students should know that this course involves a lot of reading, but they will encounter a lot of interesting topics, especially about the history of museums.

Fall 2013

Professor: Paul Carroll, Jeffrey Wood

(4.83)

Students thought that the reading materials, the class discussions, and the lectures were some of the best aspects of this course. They found the information interesting, and the professor very knowledgeable. At times, however, they found the workload heavy, and some of the materials were difficult to get through. Other students found the course to be very detail-oriented, from the complexity of the exams to the high grading standards. Suggestions for improvement include fewer readings, and spending more time reviewing materials for the exams, as well as a study guide. Prospective students are encouraged to take detailed notes and to stay on top of the reading. Students should have good memorization skills and be good with details.

Fall 2014

Professor: Paul Carroll, Jeffrey Wood

(4.71)

Students praised this course for having a well-informed and enthusiastic instructor who led engaging and clear lectures. Perceived issues with the course included a belief from multiple students that a lack of details in the instructor’s PowerPoints forced students to have to take copious notes. In addition, students thought that the assigned reading could be excessive and in particular some of the older pieces weren’t as useful. Suggestions for improvement included that the instructor provide more in-depth notes to the students. In additions, students thought the course could be improved if they were made more interactive by increasing the amount of in-class discussions. Prospective students should know that students found that the course didn’t require any background knowledge.

Lecture Sections

(01)

No location info
B. BangsbollT. IveyT. LeungB. ThompsonZ. Yeager
06:00 - 09:00