The best aspect of the course was Professor Spicer, who was not only enthusiastic, but lead very engaging lectures. Most students real y enjoyed the topics that were covered throughout the semester. Many students were not happy with the attendance/participation grading system, more importantly the lottery system that was used to cal on students. Students suggested revamping the method for gathering attendance/participation grades. Perspective students should know that attendance is mandatory and writing a few papers will be required. Overall, it’s a great course that explores interesting material.

Many students enrol ed in this course enjoyed the lectures that made them want to come to class each day. The material was interesting and presented in a unique way, and the course was described as the magazine “Popular Science.” Also, there was a minimal amount of work and the professor had an exciting personality. However, students disliked being called on to participate, the papers, the grading system, and the large class size. It was suggested that there be fewer readings, more guest speakers, and more interaction with the class. Prospective students who are looking for a fun, senior spring class should take this.

The best aspects of the course included the entertaining and engaging course material and the writing assignments that encouraged students to pursue their own interests. The professor clearly presented and thoroughly discussed course material. Some students felt that being randomly selected to answer questions was anxiety inducing, and grading was unclear due to a lack of feedback. Suggestions for improvement included decreasing the emphasis on class attendance and participation, and offering more guidance on written assignments. Prospective students should be prepared to stay on top of reading assignments and to attend all lectures. This manageable course is a good option for humanities students needing to fulfil science requirements.