Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | EN.540.204

Applied Physical Chemistry

3.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(3.21)

The topics in this course include thermodynamic models for multicomponent phase equilibrium including vapor liquid equilibrium, phase diagrams, activity models and colligative properties in both non-electrolyte and electrolyte solutions. . A link between average thermodynamic properties and microstates and molecular interactions is made via a discussion of intermolecular forces and the partition function. Also covered are thermodynamic relationships to describe chemical equilibria, and basic concepts in quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics.

Fall 2012

(3.09)

Fall 2013

(3.54)

Fall 2014

(3.0)

Fall 2012

Professor: David Gracias

(3.09)

Students enjoyed the interesting subject matter and the professor provided useful lecture notes. As for negative aspects, some students felt there were not enough preparation materials like reviews or homework assignments. In addition, many considered the grading policy unfair. Suggestions for improvement included giving partial credit on exams and more practice problems to do before exams. Students recommended buying the solutions manual and doing al the practice problems in the book.

Fall 2013

Professor: David Gracias

(3.54)

Students praised this course for covering interesting material and for having a great lecturer who took questions from students. Many students disliked that their final grade was chiefly determined by the course’s final exam. Suggestions for improvement included a desire by more students that the instructor present information in a more linear manner. Students also requested more practice problems so they could better master the material. Prospective students should know that the course didn’t have much homework and that the course closely fol owed the textbook.

Fall 2014

Professor: David Gracias

(3.0)

Students’ favorite aspects of this class were the interesting material covered and the small number of homework assignments. Students perceived that the biggest weakness of the class was that the range of concepts covered seemed disjointed and that there could have been a more coherent progression of material from lecture to lecture. Students thought the course could benefit from additional problems being offered in homework or class. They also felt it was valuable for potential participants to know that some knowledge of thermodynamics would be useful for this class.