Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | EN.560.451

Smart Transportation and Autonomous Vehicles

3.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.19)

This course offers an in-depth exploration of the evolving landscape of smart transportation systems and autonomous vehicle technologies. Students will study the integration of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and automation, with a focus on the development, challenges, and future of autonomous vehicles (AVs) within open-world traffic settings. Key topics include sensor technologies, data quality control and bias mitigation, data processing algorithms, machine learning, vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication, human-machine interaction, and ethical considerations in technology deployment. Additionally, the course will cultivate students with advanced data processing skills and the role of data science in transportation, emphasizing data-driven solutions for safety, mobility, and sustainability. By the end of the course, students will have gained a comprehensive understanding of how smart technologies are shaping the future of transportation and the role of AVs in fostering safer, more efficient, and sustainable urban mobility systems.

Fall 2012

(4.29)

Fall 2013

(3.78)

Fall 2014

(4.5)

Fall 2012

Professor: John Matteo

(4.29)

Students enjoyed putting their skil s to use on real-world engineering problems. However, they said that the professor’s disorganization detracted from the class. He did not make his expectations for assignments clear and often changed due dates. Students suggested that the course would be improved by better organization and with clearer deadlines and expectations for assignments. Overall, students said this was a fun course that allowed them to put the skil s they learned to use.

Fall 2013

Professor: John Matteo

(3.78)

Students thought the class field trip to Wisconsin to examine a building the group was redesigning was a highlight of the course because it allowed students to connect classroom learning with the real world. However, some students felt that the instructor didn’t have a firm grasp on control in the classroom, which could lead to students getting out of hand. In addition, some students disliked that the course and assignments seemed to lack firm goals and deadlines. Suggestions for improvement included implementing more structure into the class so that it could cover more information or bring in additional speakers. Prospective students should know that students found the course’s workload was light and the atmosphere was laid back. Drawing skills were found to be helpful but not necessary.

Fall 2014

Professor: John Matteo

(4.5)

Students praised this course for including a variety of hands on learning with students in particular praising the three day field trip students took. Perceived issues with the course were few, although a few students wished that instead of meeting once a week for two hours students would meet twice a week for a shorter period. Suggestions for improvement were few as most students were happy with the course although, one student wished the class field trip would examine a current problem that is being solved by civil engineering. Prospective students should know that students found the course was the capstone to their experiences and studies in civil engineering. Also, students found it important to have a good foundation in structural and foundations design in order to be successful in the course.