Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | EN.570.607

Energy Policy and Planning Models

3.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.59)

Methods for optimizing operation and design of energy systems and for analyzing market impacts of energy and environmental policies are reviewed, emphasizing both theory and solution of actual models. Review of linear and nonlinear programming and complementarity methods for market simulation. Recommended Course Background: EN.570.493 and EN.570.495 or equivalent.

Spring 2013

(4.68)

Spring 2014

(4.48)

Spring 2015

(4.64)

Spring 2023

(4.55)

Spring 2013

Professor: Benjamin Hobbs

(4.68)

The best aspects of this course included the lectures, the professor’s teaching style, and the different types of models students learned in class. The students also found the discussions, notes, and assignments very helpful. The worst aspects of the course included the heavy workload and difficult exams. The course would improve if there were more lessons on energy policy, average cost pricing, and energy system modeling. Students also recommend more practical and creative projects/lessons. Prospective students should be prepared to spend lots of time with some very chal enging homework assignments, and should have a good math background to take this course.

Spring 2014

Professor: Benjamin Hobbs

(4.48)

The best aspects of this course were the chal enging but rewarding assignments, energy modeling, and an engaged and knowledgeable instructor. Many students found the information corresponded wel with material in other courses and what wil be expected in the real world. However, many students cited the heavy workload and the time spent on economics as the worst aspects of the course. Suggestions for improvement included giving handouts online rather than on paper, reducing the workload, and more examples in class of the homework problems. Prospective students should know that the workload is high but the course is interesting and taught wel .

Spring 2015

Professor: Benjamin Hobbs

(4.64)

The best aspects of this course included the student lectures, engaging class discussions, and interesting course materials. Some students felt that the studies were hard to understand which made student presentations difficult. The instructor was often late or at times absent from the class, and there were limited opportunities for feedback. Suggestions for improvement included having open discussion led by the instructor, creating deadlines to work towards writing a shorter final paper, and having more opportunities for feedback. Prospective students should have a strong background in mathematics and be prepared to lead discussion and lecture once a semester. Students interested in hydrology are encouraged to meet with the instructor prior to leading discussion or giving lecture.

Spring 2023

Professor: Ben Hobbs

(4.55)