Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | EN.580.412

Design Team Health-Tech Project II

4.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.13)

A two semester course sequence where juniors and seniors work with a team leader and a group of BME freshmen and sophomores, to solve open-ended problems in biomedical engineering. Upperclassmen are expected to apply their general knowledge and experience, and their knowledge in their concentration area, to teach lower classmen and to generate the solution to practical problems encountered in biomedical engineering. Senior-level version of EN.580.311-312. Permission of course directors required.

Spring 2013

(3.4)

Spring 2014

(3.96)

Spring 2015

(4.0)

Spring 2023

(4.47)

Spring 2023

(4.48)

Spring 2023

(4.49)

Spring 2013

Professor: Robert Al en

(3.4)

The best aspects of this course included it being design-oriented, not textbook-oriented; also, students appreciated the opportunity to work in groups and interact with people who are experts in their specific BME field. One student felt that not al team judges were aware of the presentation rubrics or knowledgeable of project subject matter. Some students felt the lectures were disorganized and rushed. Suggestions included incorporating laboratory time for students to spend on projects, and making faculty members available to assist students with difficulties. Prospective students should know that in order to be successful in this class, significant time commitments are a must, especially since faculty assistance is limited. 34

Spring 2014

Professor: Robert Al en

(3.96)

36 The highlights of this course were the real world experience, the ability to work through the design process from start to finish, and the meaningful team based problem solving. Resources were available to students to design a solution to a real world problem. The worst aspects of this course were the unclear and arbitrary grading method, meandering lectures, and lack of guidance. Suggestions for improving the course included more lab space, clarity with regards to grading rubrics, and more committee members or advisors. Prospective students should have experience with a variety of technical skills like coding, CAD, electrical engineering, or circuitry. This course is highly recommended.

Spring 2015

Professor: Robert Al en

(4.0)

The best aspects of this course included the ability to collaborate with a team of classmates, and to apply engineering knowledge to design a medical device created to solve a clinical problem. Students felt that it was hard to get guidance from professors and that there were few opportunities for feedback. Lectures were irrelevant and students felt that grading was unclear with little guidance for assignments. Suggestions for improvement included having set opportunities for feedback, having clear expectations outlined at the beginning of the semester, and having more structured and engaging lectures. Prospective students should be aware of the large time commitment and work load of the

Spring 2023

Professor: Nicholas Durr

(4.47)

Spring 2023

Professor: Elizabeth Logsdon

(4.48)

Spring 2023

Professor: Michelle Zwernemann

(4.49)