The best aspects of this course included the freedom to both code and write apps, the motivation with which the instructor provided students to work independently, and the teacher/pupil interaction. Some 79 students felt both the class and instructor were disorganized. One student felt as though there was too much reliance on the textbook insofar as relaying subject material. Suggestions included incorporating prewritten homework assignments and making certain lectures pertain to the material. Prospective students should be comfortable with Java and be prepared to do independent research.

The best aspect of this course was that students learned how to code Android applications completely from scratch. Students were able to choose their own final project and work in groups. Also, the provided materials for UI testing were very convenient, and evaluating other people’s designs was good practice. However, many students felt that the professor was ineffective and that they didn’t learn anything. In addition, the course lacked structure and the beginning parts of the class were very difficult. It was suggested by students that the time spent on design reviews be limited, that there be more guidance during the final project, and that more time be spent on Android coding. Prospective students should make sure they have Java down and are able to teach themselves concepts.

86The best aspects of the class included the opportunity to learn about programming through the hands-on development of an Android app and the freedom to develop a project within a group setting. Some students felt that the course was too focused on the design aspect of the project and did not include enough about development or implementation. Students suggested spending more time on the actual coding, and making the class more organized and structured with clearer deadlines. Prospective students may benefit from a prior background with Java, and should be prepared for some independent learning of Android programming.