Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | EN.660.332

Leadership Theory

3.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.5)

Students will be introduced to the history of Leadership Theory from the “Great Man” theory of born leaders to Transformational Leadership theory of non-positional learned leadership. Transformational Leadership theory postulates that leadership can be learned and enhanced. The course will explore the knowledge base and skills necessary to be an effective leader in a variety of settings. Students will assess their personal leadership qualities and develop a plan to enhance their leadership potential.

Fall 2012

(4.78)

Fall 2012

(4.17)

Fall 2013

(4.68)

Fall 2014

(4.64)

Fall 2022

(3.95)

Spring 2013

(4.67)

Spring 2014

(4.68)

Spring 2015

(4.65)

Spring 2023

(4.32)

Fall 2012

Professor: William Smedick

(4.78)

Students said they enjoyed the interesting topics covered and could apply the material to their own lives. They also liked the experiential style of the course and the variety of assignments given. Students did not like the large amount of work and said some of it was not very relevant. Students suggested that the course would be improved by having more hands-on leadership experiences and more class discussions. Students recommended this course as a fun class that will teach you a lot. Students should

Fall 2012

Professor: Donna Crane

(4.17)

Students enjoyed the interesting lectures with real-world applications. They liked that the professor shared her experiences from working in the field. The negative aspects of the course were the heavy workload, tough grading, and the dry textbook. Student suggestions included making the writing assignments shorter and giving more guidance on what is expected for assignments. Students should expect a writing-intensive class and should be aware that the professor grades strictly.

Fall 2013

Professor: William Smedick

(4.68)

Students liked how the materials covered in this course were so applicable to their everyday lives. They found the lectures to be very interesting, and the materials, especially the personality tests, to be very thought-provoking, and enjoyed the active class discussions. Students found that the work quickly piled up and that the group projects were either hit-or-miss because they were assigned. Students recommended providing more thorough instructions for the final assignment, and felt that staggering the various assignments would make them easier to complete, rather than leaving them al until the end of the semester. Prospective students are highly encouraged to take this course if they are interested in pursuing a leadership role in the workplace, or are just interested in learning more about themselves in general. The course is writing intensive, but students found the course to be very stimulating and enjoyable.

Fall 2014

Professor: Wiliam Smedick

(4.64)

Students liked the way the engaging and friendly instructor for this course effectively incorporated discussion into class sessions. Students’ least favorite aspect of the class was the large number of writing assignments required. They believed the course could be improved with clearer instructions for assignments. Students also thought it was useful for potential participants to know that this is a writing intensive course where class participation is important.

Fall 2022

Professor: Mc Coghlan

(3.95)

Spring 2013

Professor: William Smedick

(4.67)

The best aspects of this course included the group project, classroom discussions, and enthusiastic instructor. One student felt that the deadlines for the project were not clearly defined. Another student felt that the assignments were often repetitive. Suggestions included eliminating the New York Times articles and providing students with more time on the reflection papers. Prospective students should know this is a writing-intensive course.

Spring 2014

Professor: William Smedick

(4.68)

Not only were students enrol ed in this course expected to consider what kind of leader they were, but they also were able to apply their skills to a consulting project that involved groups in which they would hold leadership positions. Also, there were a wide range of assignments that built students’ grades and much of the information learned can be referred to later in life. This course was extremely writing intensive, and the Blackboard site and syllabus were unclear. It was suggested that the first half of this course be expanded and the second be eliminated, that there be less written work and more guest speakers, and that they watch films about leaders in history. Prospective students should not that this course is of low difficulty, but requires a lot of writing.

Spring 2015

Professor: William Smedick

(4.65)

The best aspects of the course included the interactive class discussions, the invested and engaging instructor, and the thorough evaluation of course material. Students appreciated the clearly outlined expectations and overal organization of the course. Students found that the due dates for assignments were unclear, and that the workload at the end of the semester was overwhelming. Suggestions for improvement included having either a final project or exam instead of both, adding more real world applications, and providing a syllabus with clearly outlined due dates. Prospective students will find this course enjoyable and the grading fair. Students should be prepared for a writing intensive course and come to class ready to participate.

Spring 2023

Professor: Mc Coghlan

(4.32)

Lecture Sections

(01)

No location info
M. Coghlan
15:00 - 16:15

(02)

No location info
T. Sanchez
13:30 - 14:45

(03)

No location info
M. Coghlan
16:30 - 17:45