Semester.ly

Johns Hopkins University | PY.530.414

Keyboard Literature IV

2.0

credits

Average Course Rating

(4.4)

A survey of the piano music of the 20th and early 21st centuries from its post-romantic roots to the present. Works will be considered from a range of perspectives, including stylistic, analytic, historical, and interpretive.

Fall 2012

(4.58)

Fall 2013

(4.47)

Fall 2014

(4.14)

Fall 2012

Professor: Dan Stoianovici

(4.58)

The best aspects of this course were the hands-on learning and the useful skil s learned. The downsides were the very intense workload and the fast pace of the class. Students’ suggestions included getting better and timelier feedback on homework, in addition to splitting up the lecture into two lectures per week instead of one. Students should know that the course is extremely time-consuming. However, it will give you a great understanding of CAD, which is essential for engineers.

Fall 2013

Professor: Dan Stoianovici

(4.47)

One of the better aspects of this course was learning the CAD software, which students believed would be extremely useful for school and the workplace. Students liked the practicality of the course and thought that the professor taught the information very wel . Most students found that the homework was very long and time-consuming, and that they would only receive the answers to the questions instead of being walked through the steps during office hours. Suggestions for improvement included changing the class to meet twice a week, and shortening the homework assignments. Students also thought that a final, semester-long project would be more effective than a final exam. They wished there was some way to record the lecture, too. Prospective students are highly encouraged to take this course if they need to learn and practice CAD. They should be prepared to put in long hours and take very thorough notes during class to capture al of the steps discussed in the lecture.

Fall 2014

Professor: Dan Stoianovici

(4.14)

Students thought that the most beneficial aspect of this course was the in-depth experience they received with computer-aided design software and the related practical knowledge they gained. Students felt the biggest drawback for the course was the large time commitment required for completing homework assignments. They also believed that the course could have been improved with the addition of more reference or instructional materials for the software being used in the course. People thinking about taking this class should know that the workload for this course was exceptionally large but the class was rewarding in terms of relevant knowledge gained, students said.